MH1 Intelligence

Meribel

Comprehensive Strategy & Research Report

April 2026

$2.9M
(single Seattle clinic at 50% utilization)
$5.8M
. By Year 5 with 5–8 clinics: **$25M–$40M**
M

Built by MH-1

AI Marketing Operations Engine

Multi-agent orchestration system coordinating specialist AI agents, live platform APIs, and human expertise. Weeks of analyst work, delivered in hours with full data provenance.

12
Skills Deployed
Analysis, extraction, strategy & more
12
Sandboxed Agents
Parallel isolated execution
4
Execution Phases
Sequential with quality gates
16
Deliverables Produced
Schema-validated outputs
3
Live API Integrations
CRM, competitive intel, market data
Multi-Agent Orchestration12 specialist agents in isolated sandboxes with dedicated tools and API keys.
Deterministic ExecutionSchema enforcement, evidence ledgers, and quality gates at every phase. No hallucinated data.
Live Platform IntelligenceDirect API connections to Meribel Health's platforms. Every metric traces to verified source data.
Human-in-the-LoopMarketerHire operators guide strategy and validate recommendations. AI handles depth and scale.

How MH-1 Built This Report

4 execution phases, each building on validated outputs from the last.

~200
Analyst-Hours Equivalent
Compressed to hours
100%
Data Provenance
Every claim traceable to source
12
Skills Deployed
Coordinated across 4 phases
1

Discovery & Data Extraction (2 parallel agents)

MH-1 agents connected to Meribel Health's live platforms and extracted data at scale.

  • CRM Discovery
  • Data Quality Audit
  • Market Intelligence
2

Analysis & Pattern Recognition (4 parallel agents)

Specialist agents ran parallel analyses across competitive, financial, and performance dimensions.

  • Competitive Analysis
  • Performance Audit
  • P&L Validation
3

Strategy & Content Generation (2 parallel agents)

Analysis outputs were synthesized into actionable strategy and ready-to-deploy recommendations.

  • Media Planning
  • Positioning Strategy
  • Creative Brief
4

Quality Assurance & Synthesis (2 parallel agents)

Every deliverable cross-validated before consolidation into this final report.

  • Schema Validation
  • Evidence Ledger
  • Report Synthesis

Intelligence at scale, grounded in real data

Every recommendation traces to a verified data source. No guesswork — only platform-connected, schema-validated intelligence.

01

HERO_STATS

  • label: Procedure Time

value: "10 min" sub: avg per patient

  • label: Pain-Free Rate

value: "92%" sub: 0 pain in 5 post-op days

  • label: 5-Year Efficacy

value: "87%" sub: asymptomatic at 5 years

  • label: Clinics Operating

value: "0" sub: Seattle under construction

02

Executive Summary

What's Happening

Meribel Health is a pre-launch MedTech company commercializing Thermal Submucosal Hemorrhoidopexy (TSH) — a patented, 10-minute, minimally invasive hemorrhoid treatment. The company holds IP on a proprietary anoscope device, has published clinical outcomes for 248 patients (5-year follow-up), and is building its first owned clinic in Seattle. No marketing platforms are live. No patients have been treated in the US. The Seattle clinic is under construction with an opening date TBD.

The consumer-facing procedure brand is FAST (visible in Figma website design). Meribel Health is the corporate entity behind FAST, mirroring how Align Technology operates behind Invisalign.

Why It Matters

This is a category creation moment. TSH directly addresses the largest unmet need in hemorrhoid care: the gap between ineffective OTC treatment and feared surgical hemorrhoidectomy. An estimated 10.4 million Americans suffer from hemorrhoids annually. The majority avoid treatment due to fear of surgery. TSH's near-zero pain profile and same-day recovery directly removes this barrier — but patients cannot self-refer to a procedure they've never heard of. Every month without a website, a Google Ads campaign, and a functioning clinic is a month of zero revenue and zero brand-building in a market that will be won by whoever captures patient awareness first.

Revenue at stake: Base case Year 1 = $2.9M (single Seattle clinic at 50% utilization). Year 2 at maturity = $5.8M. By Year 5 with 5–8 clinics: $25M–$40M. These numbers are achievable only if the marketing infrastructure is built now, not retroactively.

What We Do About It

Three actions unlock everything else:

Launch the FAST website
(procedure page, consultation form, schema markup, GA4) — this is the conversion endpoint without which no marketing spend has anywhere to go.
Stand up Google Ads — Seattle geo
symptom-based paid search is the fastest path to high-intent patient volume. LASIK benchmarks suggest $82–$150 CPL is achievable in a mature campaign.
Build the physician referral program
GI doctors and PCPs in the Seattle metro are seeing Grade II–III hemorrhoid patients every week with nowhere to refer them. A referral packet + 10 active referral relationships could generate 20–40% of Year 1 patient volume at near-zero acquisition cost.

03

Key Findings

Finding 1: The procedure brand is FAST — and that's a strategic asset. The Figma website design shows a clean, modern brand called "FAST" distinct from "Meribel Health." This mirrors Invisalign (vs. Align Technology) and is the right call. Patients will search for "FAST procedure" not "Meribel Health." The brand must be built around FAST, with Meribel as the corporate credibility layer.

Finding 2: The biggest competitive threat is CRH O'Regan — not surgeons. CRH has 3,000+ locations, established insurance coverage, and is entrenched with GI physicians. TSH's single-session advantage and superior Grade III outcomes are the differentiators. But CRH has distribution; TSH does not. Distribution must be built urgently.

Finding 3: THD/HAL is weakening — and TSH can own that vacancy. As of March 2025, major payers have classified THD as "investigational for all indications." This is a significant competitor exit from the middle-market. TSH can position as the next-generation minimally invasive alternative with published evidence and no investigational designation.

Finding 4: Insurance is the medium-term unlock, not the launch constraint. Cash-pay at $3,000–$5,000 limits the total addressable market but is viable at launch (LASIK and Sono Bello proved cash-pay models work). The Paris and NYC controlled trials (H2 2026) are the insurance pathway — positive RCT data is what payers need to assign CPT codes and extend coverage.

Finding 5: The published journal article is underutilized. Sias & Milone (2025), Journal of Surgery, is the most valuable marketing asset in the portfolio. It is the basis for every clinical claim, the physician referral packet anchor, and the credibility signal that separates FAST from unproven alternatives. It must be front-and-center on the website, in press outreach, and in every physician conversation.


04

Business Scorecard

KPI Benchmark / Target Current Status
Monthly Procedures 120 (base capacity) 0 🔴 Pre-launch
Monthly Revenue $480K (base) $0 🔴 Pre-launch
Patient Acquisition Cost $600 (blended target) N/A 🔴 No campaigns live
Cost per Lead (CPL) $82–$150 (LASIK benchmark) N/A 🔴 No campaigns live
Lead → Consultation Rate 60–80% N/A 🔴 No leads yet
Consultation → Procedure Rate 40–60% (Sono Bello benchmark) N/A 🔴 No consultations yet
Website Sessions 2,000/mo (Month 12 target) 0 🔴 No website live
Landing Page CVR 5–15% N/A 🔴 No website live
Google Rating 4.5+ stars N/A 🔴 No GBP set up
Clinic Utilization 50% Year 1 → 80% mature 0% 🔴 Pre-construction
Physician Referral Relationships 10 by Month 12 0 🔴 Not started
LTV:PAC Ratio >3:1 (target 6.7:1) N/A 🟡 Strong unit economics modeled
Published Clinical Evidence Level IV (case series) ✅ Published Dec 2025 🟢 In place
IP / Patents Proprietary anoscope ✅ Filed 🟢 In place
Business Scorecard
0 $0 0 0% 0 Monthly Procedures Monthly Revenue Website Sessions Clinic Utilization Physician Referral…
Bottom line: Every revenue and marketing metric is at zero. This is expected for a pre-launch company. The published clinical evidence and IP are the two green nodes. Everything else must be built in the next 60–90 days.

05

Market Opportunity & Seasonality

Market Size

Segment Data
Americans with hemorrhoids (annual) ~10.4 million
Seek treatment (estimate) ~3.5 million/year
Grade II–III (TSH-eligible) ~2.1 million/year
Seattle DMA addressable ~35,000–50,000/year (est.)
TSH-eligible + self-pay capable ~10,000–15,000/year (Seattle)
Market Size
Americans with hemorrhoids (annual)~10.4 million
Seek treatment (estimate)~3.5 million/year
Grade II–III (TSH-eligible)~2.1 million/year
Seattle DMA addressable~35,000–50,000/year (est.)
TSH-eligible + self-pay capable~10,000–15,000/year (Seattle)

TSH's serviceable market at Seattle launch: 10,000–15,000 potential candidates in the metro, with base capacity of ~1,440 procedures/year (120/month). Year 1 target captures less than 10% of the eligible self-pay population — demand is not the constraint, supply and awareness are.

Seasonality

Hemorrhoid treatment demand follows a well-documented seasonal pattern aligned with GI procedure calendars:

Period Demand Level Driver
Jan–Mar High "New year, fix it" resolution mindset; deductibles reset
Apr–Jun Moderate-High Pre-summer motivation; warmer weather discomfort
Jul–Aug Moderate Summer vacation disrupts scheduling
Sep–Nov High Back-to-normal, insurance end-of-year utilization
Dec Low Holiday disruption, insurance uncertainty
Seasonality
Jan–Mar
Demand LevelHigh
Driver"New year, fix it" resolution mindset; deductibles reset
Apr–Jun
Demand LevelModerate-High
DriverPre-summer motivation; warmer weather discomfort
Jul–Aug
Demand LevelModerate
DriverSummer vacation disrupts scheduling
Sep–Nov
Demand LevelHigh
DriverBack-to-normal, insurance end-of-year utilization
Dec
Demand LevelLow
DriverHoliday disruption, insurance uncertainty
Implication for Seattle launch: If the clinic opens in summer 2026, the marketing ramp should target the Sept–Nov 2026 peak demand window as the first meaningful revenue period.

06

Acquisition Economics

Unit Economics Model

Scenario CPL Consult Rate Proc Rate PAC Revenue/Proc LTV:PAC
Conservative (launch) $150 40% 45% $833 $4,000 4.8:1
Base (6-month maturity) $120 50% 50% $480 $4,000 8.3:1
Optimized (12-month) $100 55% 55% $331 $4,000 12.1:1
Physician referral (all stages) ~$50 85%+ 75%+ ~$78 $4,000 51:1
Unit Economics Model
40% 50% 55% Conservative (laun… Base (6-month matu… Optimized (12-mont…

Working assumption for Year 1 planning: $600 blended PAC — accounting for the ramp period and mix of paid search, SEO, and early physician referrals.

Channel Economics (Benchmarked)

Channel CPL Benchmark Source FAST Applicability
Google Search (symptom-intent) $82–$150 LASIK industry data High — patients actively searching
Google Search (branded) $15–$40 Medical procedure benchmarks Medium — low volume until brand awareness builds
Meta Ads (awareness) $200–$500 Medical procedure, restricted Medium — platform restrictions on medical content
Physician Referrals Near-zero CRH O'Regan model High — highest-quality leads, lowest cost
SEO / Organic $0 CPL (deferred cost) Standard High — 4–8 month lag, then highest ROI
Review / Word of Mouth $0 CPL Patient satisfaction High — NPS-driven at 87% symptom-free rate
Channel Economics (Benchmarked)
Google Search (symptom-intent)
CPL Benchmark$82–$150
SourceLASIK industry data
FAST ApplicabilityHigh — patients actively searching
Google Search (branded)
CPL Benchmark$15–$40
SourceMedical procedure benchmarks
FAST ApplicabilityMedium — low volume until brand awareness builds
Meta Ads (awareness)
CPL Benchmark$200–$500
SourceMedical procedure, restricted
FAST ApplicabilityMedium — platform restrictions on medical content
Physician Referrals
CPL BenchmarkNear-zero
SourceCRH O'Regan model
FAST ApplicabilityHigh — highest-quality leads, lowest cost
SEO / Organic
CPL Benchmark$0 CPL (deferred cost)
SourceStandard
FAST ApplicabilityHigh — 4–8 month lag, then highest ROI
Review / Word of Mouth
CPL Benchmark$0 CPL
SourcePatient satisfaction
FAST ApplicabilityHigh — NPS-driven at 87% symptom-free rate

Max CPL Guardrails

At $4,000 revenue per procedure and target margins:

$240
Hard ceiling CPL: (maintains 3:1 LTV:PAC at 40% consult/40% proc rates)
$100
Target CPL: –$150 (matches LASIK benchmarks)
$50
Physician referral cost: Effectively –$100 per procedure (relationship investment amortized)

07

Funnel Performance

Current State: Zero Baseline

No live platforms, no data. All figures below are benchmark targets based on LASIK, Sono Bello, and CRH O'Regan analogs.

Target Funnel — Google Ads (Month 6)

Stage Monthly Volume Rate Notes
Impressions (Seattle geo) 50,000–80,000 Symptom-intent keywords
Clicks 750–1,200 1.5% CTR Medical procedure typical
Leads (form + call) 100–180 13% CVR LASIK benchmark landing page
Booked Consultations 60–108 60% booking rate Goal: same-day callback
Clinical Candidates 48–86 80% candidacy TSH eligible (Grade II–III)
Procedures Scheduled 22–47 45% decision rate Cash-pay friction is key variable
Procedures Completed 21–44 95% show rate Confirmation + reminder protocol
CPL target $120 $15K monthly ad spend ÷ 125 avg leads
Monthly revenue $84K–$176K At $4,000 per procedure
Target Funnel — Google Ads (Month 6)
Impressions (Seattle geo)
Monthly Volume50,000–80,000
Rate
NotesSymptom-intent keywords
Clicks
Monthly Volume750–1,200
Rate1.5% CTR
NotesMedical procedure typical
Leads (form + call)
Monthly Volume100–180
Rate13% CVR
NotesLASIK benchmark landing page
Booked Consultations
Monthly Volume60–108
Rate60% booking rate
NotesGoal: same-day callback
Clinical Candidates
Monthly Volume48–86
Rate80% candidacy
NotesTSH eligible (Grade II–III)
Procedures Scheduled
Monthly Volume22–47
Rate45% decision rate
NotesCash-pay friction is key variable
Procedures Completed
Monthly Volume21–44
Rate95% show rate
NotesConfirmation + reminder protocol
CPL target
Monthly Volume$120
Rate
Notes$15K monthly ad spend ÷ 125 avg leads
Monthly revenue
Monthly Volume$84K–$176K
Rate
NotesAt $4,000 per procedure

Target Funnel — Physician Referral (Month 6)

Stage Monthly Volume Rate Notes
Active referring physicians 5 Goal: 10 by Month 12
Referrals per physician/month 2–4 Typical GI referral volume for specialty
Monthly referral leads 10–20 High-quality, pre-qualified
Consultation completion 9–18 90%+ Referred patients are high-intent
Procedures completed 7–13 75% Higher than paid search (pre-qualified)
PAC (physician referral) ~$75 Relationship investment / volume
Target Funnel — Physician Referral (Month 6)
Active referring physicians
Monthly Volume5
Rate
NotesGoal: 10 by Month 12
Referrals per physician/month
Monthly Volume2–4
Rate
NotesTypical GI referral volume for specialty
Monthly referral leads
Monthly Volume10–20
Rate
NotesHigh-quality, pre-qualified
Consultation completion
Monthly Volume9–18
Rate90%+
NotesReferred patients are high-intent
Procedures completed
Monthly Volume7–13
Rate75%
NotesHigher than paid search (pre-qualified)
PAC (physician referral)
Monthly Volume~$75
Rate
NotesRelationship investment / volume

08

Competitive Context

Procedure Competitor Landscape

Competitor Mechanism Sessions Pain Profile Recovery Insurance Threat Level
CRH O'Regan (Banding) Tissue necrosis 3 (6 wks) Mild–moderate per session Same day Covered 🔴 HIGH
Hemorrhoidectomy Tissue excision 1 Severe (48–72hr peak) 2–4 weeks Covered 🟡 MEDIUM (patients avoid)
THD/HAL Doppler de-arterialization 1 Moderate 1–2 weeks ⚠️ Investigational (Mar 2025) 🟢 WEAKENING
Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Circumferential stapling 1 Moderate 1–2 weeks Declining utilization 🟢 DECLINING
FAST (TSH) Thermal repositioning 1 92% zero pain Same/next day TBD (cash-pay at launch)
Procedure Competitor Landscape
Hemorrhoidectomy
1
THD/HAL
1
Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy
1
FAST (TSH)
1

Competitive Analysis: Where FAST Wins and Where It's Vulnerable

FAST's durable advantages:

  • Single 10-minute session vs. CRH's 3-session protocol over 6 weeks
  • 92% zero pain vs. moderate-to-severe for all surgical alternatives
  • Zero stenosis, incontinence, or infection in 248-patient published study
  • Anatomical restoration (repositions tissue) vs. destruction (banding) or removal (excision)
  • Published 5-year follow-up data — stronger than CRH's published evidence for Grade III
  • THD vacancy: THD is being abandoned by payers; FAST can capture the "minimally invasive, not surgery" position

FAST's current vulnerabilities:

  • Insurance coverage undefined — limits to self-pay patients (~30% of eligible population)
  • Zero US clinical locations vs. CRH's 3,000+
  • Level IV evidence (case series) — cannot make comparative superiority claims
  • No sedation-free option — anesthesia requirement vs. CRH's anesthesia-free approach
  • Brand awareness: zero — patients cannot seek a procedure they've never heard of
The strategic window: CRH O'Regan is entrenched in the physician-network model. FAST's owned-clinic, patient-direct model is a different distribution strategy — not competing for physician loyalty, but going direct to the patient. This avoids the head-to-head channel conflict and creates a premium branded experience CRH cannot replicate through its GI network.

GTM Model Comparables

Model Company Scale Relevance to FAST
Owned-clinic patient-direct Sono Bello 80+ locations, 250K+ procedures Closest operational model
Elective procedure brand LASIK/LASIKplus Mass market, $82–$150 CPL Patient journey + paid search benchmarks
Physician network device CRH O'Regan 3,000+ locations The anti-model — learn from but don't copy
Dual-channel premium device Invisalign 20M+ patients, $7.6B market If licensing model added later
GTM Model Comparables
Owned-clinic patient-direct
CompanySono Bello
Scale80+ locations, 250K+ procedures
Relevance to FASTClosest operational model
Elective procedure brand
CompanyLASIK/LASIKplus
ScaleMass market, $82–$150 CPL
Relevance to FASTPatient journey + paid search benchmarks
Physician network device
CompanyCRH O'Regan
Scale3,000+ locations
Relevance to FASTThe anti-model — learn from but don't copy
Dual-channel premium device
CompanyInvisalign
Scale20M+ patients, $7.6B market
Relevance to FASTIf licensing model added later

09

Creative & Digital Audit

Website Audit (Figma Design — Pre-Launch)

The FAST website design is clean, modern, and credibly medical. Key findings from design review:

Element Status Recommendation
Brand name "FAST" ✅ Clear, memorable Lean into it — procedure brand is the right call
Navigation: The Procedure / About Us / Contact Us ✅ Simple, appropriate Add "Clinical Evidence" or "The Research" page
Hero copy: "A Revolutionary Non-Surgical Solution..." ⚠️ FDA guardrail risk "Revolutionary" may be a claim trigger — review with regulatory counsel
Trust badges: FDA, CE, EU-MDR ✅ Strong credibility signal Confirm exact regulatory status before live
Patient + Physician inquiry tabs ✅ Dual-audience appropriate Prioritize patient inquiry UX (higher volume)
Multilingual response (English, French, Italian) ✅ Supports Paris/Sardinia clinical network Consider adding Spanish for US market
Location map: New York, Paris, Sardinia ⚠️ Seattle is missing Update to reflect actual launch location
"Quicker Recovery Times / Lower Recurrences / Minimal Pain" ⚠️ Guardrails check needed "Lower Recurrences" vs what? Requires comparative claim substantiation
No patient testimonials visible 🔴 Gap Plan for post-launch testimonial capture (FTC compliant)
No schema markup (pre-dev) 🔴 Gap MedicalProcedure + MedicalClinic schema required at launch
GA4 / conversion tracking 🔴 Gap Must be live from day 1 — no data = no optimization
Website Audit (Figma Design — Pre-Launch)
Brand name "FAST"
Status✅ Clear, memorable
RecommendationLean into it — procedure brand is the right call
Navigation: The Procedure / About Us / Contact Us
Status✅ Simple, appropriate
RecommendationAdd "Clinical Evidence" or "The Research" page
Hero copy: "A Revolutionary Non-Surgical Solution..."
Status⚠️ FDA guardrail risk
Recommendation"Revolutionary" may be a claim trigger — review with regulatory counsel
Trust badges: FDA, CE, EU-MDR
Status✅ Strong credibility signal
RecommendationConfirm exact regulatory status before live
Patient + Physician inquiry tabs
Status✅ Dual-audience appropriate
RecommendationPrioritize patient inquiry UX (higher volume)
Multilingual response (English, French, Italian)
Status✅ Supports Paris/Sardinia clinical network
RecommendationConsider adding Spanish for US market
Location map: New York, Paris, Sardinia
Status⚠️ Seattle is missing
RecommendationUpdate to reflect actual launch location
"Quicker Recovery Times / Lower Recurrences / Minimal Pain"
Status⚠️ Guardrails check needed
Recommendation"Lower Recurrences" vs what? Requires comparative claim substantiation
No patient testimonials visible
Status🔴 Gap
RecommendationPlan for post-launch testimonial capture (FTC compliant)
No schema markup (pre-dev)
Status🔴 Gap
RecommendationMedicalProcedure + MedicalClinic schema required at launch
GA4 / conversion tracking
Status🔴 Gap
RecommendationMust be live from day 1 — no data = no optimization

Content Gaps

Content Asset Status Priority
Procedure explainer page (patient-friendly) ❌ Not built P0 — gates all other marketing
Clinical evidence page (citing Sias & Milone 2025) ❌ Not built P0 — core trust signal
FAQ page (10–15 questions from patient objections) ❌ Not built P0 — SEO + conversion
Seattle clinic page (location, hours, parking) ❌ Not built P0 — local SEO
Provider bio page ❌ Not built P1 — E-E-A-T and patient trust
Patient testimonials / outcomes ❌ No US patients yet P1 — post-launch priority
Physician referral landing page ❌ Not built P1 — enables referral program
Blog / SEO content (2/month) ❌ Not started P2 — 4–8 month lag
Content Gaps
Procedure explainer page (patient-friendly)
Status❌ Not built
PriorityP0 — gates all other marketing
Clinical evidence page (citing Sias & Milone 2025)
Status❌ Not built
PriorityP0 — core trust signal
FAQ page (10–15 questions from patient objections)
Status❌ Not built
PriorityP0 — SEO + conversion
Seattle clinic page (location, hours, parking)
Status❌ Not built
PriorityP0 — local SEO
Provider bio page
Status❌ Not built
PriorityP1 — E-E-A-T and patient trust
Patient testimonials / outcomes
Status❌ No US patients yet
PriorityP1 — post-launch priority
Physician referral landing page
Status❌ Not built
PriorityP1 — enables referral program
Blog / SEO content (2/month)
Status❌ Not started
PriorityP2 — 4–8 month lag

10

Growth Mandate

Priority 1: Website Live + Tracked (Weeks 1–6)

What: Launch the FAST website with procedure page, consultation form (HIPAA-compliant), clinical evidence section, Seattle location page, and provider bio. GA4 + conversion tracking live from day one. Schema markup on all medical content pages.
Why this first: Without a website, no marketing channel has a destination. Every dollar spent before the site is live is wasted. This gates everything else.
Owner: Amanda + development resource
KPI: Website live, GA4 active, first consultation form submission

Priority 2: Google Ads — Seattle Geo (Weeks 4–8)

What: Launch symptom-intent search campaigns targeting the Seattle metro (30-mile radius). Campaign structure: Treatment-intent (non-branded), Symptom-based, Comparison queries. Budget: $5K–$10K/month launch, scaling to $15K as CPL data matures.
Why: Paid search is the fastest path to high-intent patients. "Hemorrhoid treatment Seattle," "minimally invasive hemorrhoid surgery," and "hemorrhoid banding alternative" are queries from people already looking. LASIK achieves $82–$150 CPL in mature campaigns — FAST should target $150 at launch, $120 by Month 6.
Owner: Amanda + MH1 paid ads module
KPI: CPL < $150, landing page CVR > 8%, consultation booking rate > 60%

Priority 3: Physician Referral Program (Weeks 4–10)

What: Identify the top 50 GI and internal medicine practices within 30 miles of the Seattle clinic. Build a referral packet: clinical summary, study highlights, patient selection criteria, referral form. Gareth or a medical liaison visits practices in person — physician-to-physician credibility is irreplaceable.
Why: Referred patients have 80%+ consultation-to-procedure rates and near-zero acquisition cost. 10 active referring physicians generating 3 referrals each per month = 30 procedures/month = $120K/month from a near-zero cost channel.
Owner: Gareth (physician relationships), Amanda (logistics, materials)
KPI: 5 active referring physicians by Month 3, 10 by Month 6

Priority 4: Google Business Profile + Review Generation (Week 1, ongoing)

What: Claim and fully optimize the GBP listing before clinic opens (category: Medical Clinic / Proctologist). From first patient: automated post-procedure text with Google review link (Day 7, after confirming positive experience). Target: 20% review capture rate.
Why: For "hemorrhoid treatment near me" queries, the GBP local pack appears above paid results. Clinics with 4.5+ stars and 20+ reviews dominate this space. First-mover advantage is significant — review velocity compounds.
Owner: Amanda (GBP setup, review program), clinical team (review request trigger)
KPI: GBP live before Day 1, 4.5+ stars by Month 3, 20+ reviews by Month 6

Phase Roadmap

Phase Focus Timeline KPI Target Owner
Phase 0: Foundation Website, GBP, GA4, brand.json Weeks 1–4 Website live + tracking Amanda
Phase 1: Demand Capture Google Ads Seattle, physician outreach begins Weeks 4–8 First paid lead, 3 physician meetings Amanda + Gareth
Phase 2: Conversion Consultation flow, nurture sequence, review program Weeks 6–12 First booked procedure, 10+ reviews Amanda + clinical
Phase 3: Optimization A/B testing, SEO content cadence, retargeting Months 3–6 CPL < $130, CVR > 10% Amanda + MH1
Phase 4: Scale Physician referral maturity, Meta awareness, Influencer Months 6–12 60 procedures/mo, 10 referring MDs Amanda + MH1
Phase 5: Expansion NYC post-trial, national brand awareness 2027 Second clinic open, national SEO Gareth + Amanda
Phase Roadmap
Phase 0: Foundation
FocusWebsite, GBP, GA4, brand.json
TimelineWeeks 1–4
KPI TargetWebsite live + tracking
OwnerAmanda
Phase 1: Demand Capture
FocusGoogle Ads Seattle, physician outreach begins
TimelineWeeks 4–8
KPI TargetFirst paid lead, 3 physician meetings
OwnerAmanda + Gareth
Phase 2: Conversion
FocusConsultation flow, nurture sequence, review program
TimelineWeeks 6–12
KPI TargetFirst booked procedure, 10+ reviews
OwnerAmanda + clinical
Phase 3: Optimization
FocusA/B testing, SEO content cadence, retargeting
TimelineMonths 3–6
KPI TargetCPL < $130, CVR > 10%
OwnerAmanda + MH1
Phase 4: Scale
FocusPhysician referral maturity, Meta awareness, Influencer
TimelineMonths 6–12
KPI Target60 procedures/mo, 10 referring MDs
OwnerAmanda + MH1
Phase 5: Expansion
FocusNYC post-trial, national brand awareness
Timeline2027
KPI TargetSecond clinic open, national SEO
OwnerGareth + Amanda

This review is based on pre-launch benchmarks, published clinical data (Sias & Milone 2025), and GTM model analysis of comparable patient-direct procedure companies (LASIK, Sono Bello, CRH O'Regan). All financial projections are estimates. No live platform data is available.

Prepared by MH1 | Meribel Health | Confidential | April 2026

Back to top